|
|
92cc
Dec 9, 2009 15:29:50 GMT -5
Post by brianmann on Dec 9, 2009 15:29:50 GMT -5
Has anyone got the 92cc from monster,if so how was it???This is for a 50cc upgrade.
|
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 9, 2009 17:15:25 GMT -5
Post by tank50 on Dec 9, 2009 17:15:25 GMT -5
im sure that would be like overwhelmingly fun, fast, strong and quick, but only for like 1000 miles. take it from me. if you want to destroy your sh!t, and have lots of fun doin it, go for it. if u like riding your scooter, dont. i didnt listen to these guys, and my crank got destroyed. i have no regrets cuz it was a fun fast summer. but i wouldnt do it again.
|
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 9, 2009 17:17:53 GMT -5
Post by indy50 on Dec 9, 2009 17:17:53 GMT -5
^^^^ What he said^^^^ 49cc to 92cc kit  You got a link ? It would be fun for a few passes down a dragstrip...B4 it grenades ;D |
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 10, 2009 0:41:45 GMT -5
Post by Enviromoto on Dec 10, 2009 0:41:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 10, 2009 0:43:47 GMT -5
Post by kalekendel on Dec 10, 2009 0:43:47 GMT -5
oh jeremy... pimping out your stuff again. j/k it really is a good kit from a great seller
|
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 10, 2009 9:01:03 GMT -5
Post by rapidjim on Dec 10, 2009 9:01:03 GMT -5
To answer your question, a stock 50cc crank will not hold up very long to anything larger than a 72cc kit. I do agree it would run great till the bottom end fell apart.
A 72cc kit would wake your 50cc up and there are several dealers selling different variations and combinations, including myself. Some come with or without a head, coil, cam, carb, jets ect. Shop around and find a kit that suits what you want.
Another option would be to buy a complete 80cc motor that would go right in without any modifications, a lot less labor also.
Good Luck
Jim
|
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 10, 2009 21:25:19 GMT -5
Post by indy50 on Dec 10, 2009 21:25:19 GMT -5
Has anyone got the 92cc from monster,if so how was it???This is for a 50cc upgrade. No link ?  Monstergy6.com ? Maybe I am wrong....but, didn't see a 92 kit there, |
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 10, 2009 21:33:28 GMT -5
Post by ILLGotti on Dec 10, 2009 21:33:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 11, 2009 0:27:23 GMT -5
Post by cruiser66 on Dec 11, 2009 0:27:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 11, 2009 0:40:22 GMT -5
Post by indy50 on Dec 11, 2009 0:40:22 GMT -5
Thanx for clarifying I thought the op was reffering to monster gy6.com Funny they dont mention any modifications necessary to fit the kit Definately isn't "plug & play" Kinda misleading to a noob IMO if you can fit that kit.... without crank upgrades, it wouldn't last a week the way I ride Thanx for the link tho, it's a possibility for an 1/8 miler ;-} |
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 11, 2009 13:22:39 GMT -5
Post by cruiser66 on Dec 11, 2009 13:22:39 GMT -5
I agree. You most likely will have to mod the engine cases for this kit and it should be mentioned in the description.
66
|
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 11, 2009 18:12:54 GMT -5
Post by ILLGotti on Dec 11, 2009 18:12:54 GMT -5
yeah 59mm is huge!
|
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 12, 2009 8:44:53 GMT -5
Post by rapidjim on Dec 12, 2009 8:44:53 GMT -5
Well because of my curious and enquiring mind, I had to call to see what was up with this. The person I talked to, couldn't answer my question on whether or not the case had to be machined, he said " I don't think so, should just bolt right on." He said he couldn't tell me for sure because they didn't have any, but expected a shipment by the end of the month. He said for me to call back and he would be glad to mic the jug for me. He also said it was not a big seller.
Jim
|
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 12, 2009 22:32:33 GMT -5
Post by Enviromoto on Dec 12, 2009 22:32:33 GMT -5
+1 for a little R&D Jim.
|
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 12, 2009 23:26:38 GMT -5
Post by ILLGotti on Dec 12, 2009 23:26:38 GMT -5
I wonder if this kit is something new? I saw the 93cc kit on ebay a week or so ago, and now I am hearing about it on here. I feel like I would have stumbled upon this already if it wasn't new. I did SO MUCH research on BBK's before I put on the 47mm kit.
|
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 13, 2009 0:38:31 GMT -5
Post by cruiser66 on Dec 13, 2009 0:38:31 GMT -5
According to info from the Q & A section of the eBay item, the piston is 52 mm. How does this fit with the 139QMB engine?
66
|
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 13, 2009 1:07:50 GMT -5
Post by ILLGotti on Dec 13, 2009 1:07:50 GMT -5
52mm is the true 82cc kit. I didn't catch that on the ebay item, sorry. The one monster is selling says 59mm. That sounds about right to make 92cc.
Now that I think about it 59mm is the 150cc stock piston size! I wonder if they are just selling you a 159QMJ top end?
|
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 13, 2009 2:41:27 GMT -5
Post by indy50 on Dec 13, 2009 2:41:27 GMT -5
A stock 150 is 57mm If they're braggin a 59mm for a qmb... I'd like to see some1 install that  52 is a 82 kit, and it killed a crank in mine |
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 13, 2009 3:07:36 GMT -5
Post by ILLGotti on Dec 13, 2009 3:07:36 GMT -5
oh is it. MY BAD. Not an expert in the 152QMI or 157QMJ field. I thought it was a 159QMJ for a second I guess, lol oops.
Are the mounting holes for the top end spaced the same across the 139-152-157 field?
Meaning will a 125 or 150 top end line up to a 139 bottom end?
|
|
|
|
92cc
Dec 13, 2009 12:03:17 GMT -5
Post by indy50 on Dec 13, 2009 12:03:17 GMT -5
Are the mounting holes for the top end spaced the same across the 139-152-157 field? Meaning will a 125 or 150 top end line up to a 139 bottom end? Nope The 152 & 157 are the same The stud spacing is different on a 139 |
|
