|
Post by tortoise on Apr 21, 2010 10:49:54 GMT -5
Now if I wanted to, I could be more accurate with all this by measuring the capacity of the combustion chamber before and after the mod For others curious . . based on these "stock" head references of 5.2cc and 4.8cc, doing the rough math (gasket thickness cc's unknown), a 72cc engine with a stock head calculates out to around a 13.8:1 to 15:1 compression ratio. Around a 7.2cc combustion chamber volume would be required for a 10:1 compression ratio objective on a 72cc engine. Piston compression height may also be a factor . . 17.25mm stock as compared to perhaps 18.3mm performance. Dished piston volume. An 82cc engine using a 5cc head would have around a 16:1 compression ratio. Not surprising that the electric starter may no longer crank over these high compression conversions. Increased operating temperatures and metallurgy/drive unit stresses would all contribute to engine fatigue. Rod failure video. Stock 50cc compression ratio comparisons: Typical China 139QMB forced air cooled . . around 10:1 Kymco Agility forced air cooled . . 11:1 E-Ton Sport 50 forced air cooled . . 11.8:1 ( 89 octane gas) Sym Fiddle II forced air cooled* . . 11.8:1 Sym Mio forced air cooled* . . 12.6:1 Honda Metropolitan/Ruckus liquid cooled . . 12:1 Yamaha C3 liquid cooled . . 12:1 *ceramic coated cylinder
|
|
|
Post by Bluefront on Apr 21, 2010 12:00:50 GMT -5
This morning I finished polishing the combustion chamber.....not at all practical and not really necessary, but it looks pretty (and may inhibit carbon build-up somewhat). After working on a head, I always recommend cleaning up the gasket surface with a sanding block and #500 sandpaper......gets rid of scratches and assures a clean surface for the head-gasket. I'm going to eliminate the pulse air injection system on this scoot.....I really hate the extra noise it causes, so it goes. I made a little plate to cover the stock port for the injection tube. Again....after the installation of this BBK, my compression will be higher than stock, just not as high as 15/1. That number I consider unsafe for normal driving. You may never have any trouble with the head left completely stock, but I'm not taking the chance. A little bit of grinding with a Dremel will give me peace of mind. I'm not a racer.
|
|
|
Post by Bluefront on Apr 22, 2010 9:19:00 GMT -5
FWIW....these BBK cylinders are machined on a production line with very little hand-finishing involved. You can/should do a little finishing yourself. I always take a sharp blade and take the edges off all the casting holes....you want to feel a smooth edge on all the different openings. There were some places on this cylinder where the edge could have fallen loose (like "hanging-chad" . Only takes a few minutes..... Be sure to clean out all the openings with something like brake cleaner after you do this.....then blow the cylinder clean w/compressed air if possible. Don't forget to plug the open oil pressure hole with a 6mm short bolt...I use sealer on the threads. You absolutely don't want any leaks here. I'll get this finished, I swear.
|
|
|
Post by Bluefront on Apr 22, 2010 16:28:12 GMT -5
Further along now.....got the head and cylinder back on. I always use spray copper-coat on the base and head gaskets.....it prevents oil leaks. After you spray the gaskets, the copper-coat remains tacky for a long time...so you don't have to hurry (it won't dry very fast). I had a lot of trouble getting the piston/rings to go back in the new cylinder.......I'm right-handed and couldn't do it from the cam chain side. When I switched over to the other side, the cylinder went back on easily. Didn't even need any tools....did it all by hand. I used a 1/4" torque wrench from Harbor Freight ($20), since I couldn't find the 3/8" drive I have. Works good.... When I put everything back together, my paint marks lined up. After you crank the engine over, the mark on the chain no longer lines up (that's normal). I cranked it over a few times by hand......if you get the cam on wrong, a valve will hit the piston (and you'll have to re-time it), but nothing will get hurt.....just don't use the starter. Getting there....
|
|
|
Post by Bluefront on Apr 23, 2010 2:57:40 GMT -5
^^^^^^If you look at the top of this page, you'll see that tortoise updated his listing of compression ratios for various engines. None of them, even the liquid cooled models, run a ratio as high as 15/1. That's what I would have been running if I had not modded the stock head. Slightly more power is what I'm after here.....not a super-high compression race engine with shorter life.
|
|
|
Post by onewheeldrive on Apr 23, 2010 14:01:36 GMT -5
Not to get off topic here, but what exactly does too much compression do? A short answer if possible is fine.
|
|
|
Post by Bluefront on Apr 23, 2010 15:11:03 GMT -5
Lots of bad stuff....and nothing good for a street bike.
At 15/1 using the highest octane available (93 here), you might still detonate. This occurs when the mixture ignites in the cylinder even before the spark plug sparks (also called pre-ignition). This is due to the high pressure and resulting heat.
Eventually you'll burn a hole in the piston, break a piston or rings, blow out a rod or main bearing....or worse. And it's not easy to tell that detonation is happening on these noisy engines.....it takes a practiced ear.
Stock compression is about 10/1, maybe a little less. 15/1 is way past what would be considered safe for any street bike...IMO.
|
|
|
Post by Bluefront on Apr 27, 2010 16:16:52 GMT -5
After a few delays due to some other things going on, I'm back on the road again. I had to take the cylinder back off and replace the base gasket, which developed a leak......can't really explain it. (glad I had two base gaskets) After you do this job once, the second one would be very easy. I'd guess 3-4 hours the second time would be about right. I wasn't in any hurry, so I dragged out the first job over a two week period. It started right up.....no smoking or any unusual issues. I guess the hardest part (unless you break something) is getting the new cylinder back on over the new piston/rings. I smeared a little wheel bearing grease over the lower 1" of the cylinder....helps get the rings started. I didn't need any tools to do this. I just wiggled the cylinder back and forth gently while pushing the cylinder downward. I'm breaking in this new setup with synthetic oil....I don't buy that dino oil for 1k miles thing. Got about 30 miles on it so far, holding it to <35mph. I can't comment on the performance gains yet, but the carb jetting seems to be about like it was with the stock setup. I'll probably leave it like it is (#84 main jet) till it gets at least 200 miles on it. So far so good. Is it a job for a complete beginner? Probably not, but if you're somewhat mechanically inclined, the job isn't that hard, and you don't need a whole bunch of tools. Go for it.....
|
|
|
Post by teknoyd on Apr 27, 2010 21:49:34 GMT -5
Great thread. I'll be checking back to see what kind of performance gains you've achieved.
- Tek
|
|
|
Post by wketchin on Apr 28, 2010 21:15:49 GMT -5
I just passed the 200 mile mark after my bbk install, and now i'm considering switching back to synthetic. I'm interested in seeing how well the rings bed in with synthetic from the get-go.
|
|
|
Post by Bluefront on Apr 30, 2010 5:27:28 GMT -5
^^^^I'm not worried about that synthetic oil thing from the start. Many autos come with full synthetic oil from the factory.....been that way for quite a while, with no smoking issues. I've got about 60 miles on this BBK so far....no problems. First thing I noticed was a much quieter engine due to the removal of the Pulse injection. And the sound of the engine/exhaust was much deeper (nicer). Almost sounds like a motorcycle now. It looks like my gas mileage will remain about the same....I'll calculate it after a few tankfuls. (the stock engine gave 100mpg). I think the scoot idles better, but that could be my imagination. I know it goes up the smaller hills easier.....I can take the hills at 1/2 throttle and maintain the same speed as at WOT with the stock setup. If that's true I may even better the 100mpg I was getting. ;D One maybe problem....I'm running at smaller throttle openings now for the same speed. I may have to change the pilot jet...there's a slight bog when accelerating from slow speeds. But I'm still taking it easy for a while, bedding in the new piston/cylinder.
|
|
|
Post by wketchin on Apr 30, 2010 13:00:23 GMT -5
Yeah my RSX Type-S comes from the factory with synthetic, as well as recommends only the usage of synthetic for the entire life of the car.
|
|
|
Post by Enviromoto on Nov 13, 2010 11:32:45 GMT -5
Some actual numbers about compression ratios using a 72cc kit with your stock head. scootdawg.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=discussion&action=display&thread=34648With a 47mm bore and a 41.4 stroke things work out to this. Stock QMB139 head w/base gasket-8.54-1 static compression ratio Stock QMB 139 head w/RTV for a base gasket-9-1 static compression ratio NCY 50mm head w/base gasket-8.09-1 static compression ratio NCY 50mm head w/RTV for a base gasket-8.51 static compression ratio The rumor that using a stock head with a 72cc has too high of compression has been laid to rest. MYTH BUSTED!
|
|
|
Post by erictheviking666 on Nov 13, 2010 12:37:17 GMT -5
Sweet, that's good to know. I figured it wasn't no where near as bad as some people made it out to be. Since these things were designed originally as 72cc anyway there's no way it would raise the compression to an extreme amount.
|
|
|
Post by Bluefront on Nov 13, 2010 13:34:48 GMT -5
^^^^^^Not sure I believe that......those figures would indicate the stock compression on a 50cc GY6 is well below 8-1, if by increasing the cylinder capacity 50%, the compression is only raised to 8.54-1.
Without even doing any measuring at all.... the stock compression looks much higher than that. Just where/how were those numbers determined?
|
|
|
Post by unistarlx on Nov 13, 2010 15:22:06 GMT -5
I'm currently running an 80cc (50mm) BBK on my scoot with the stock head. While it runs fine and has excellent power, I have noticed that when starting the first turn over is hard for the electric starter, but fine afterward. Then, when running, at higher RPM's I hear what sounds like a rattle (could be pings, I use a full face helmet). I might be getting the performance head after seeing this thread, but as for now, it runs great.
|
|
|
Post by rocketdog on Nov 13, 2010 18:40:00 GMT -5
Nice writeup Blue. And well illustrated.
RD
|
|
|
Post by Enviromoto on Nov 13, 2010 21:22:40 GMT -5
[quote author=bluefront board=discussion thread=30229 post=342222 time=1289673288 Without even doing any measuring at all.... the stock compression looks much higher than that. Just where/how were those numbers determined? [/quote]
Click the link above.
|
|
|
Post by robb on Nov 14, 2010 12:32:46 GMT -5
If you are worried about too much compression; couldn't you just run 2 base gaskets or make your own single gasket from thick gasket material with an exacto knife ? Robb
|
|
|
Post by Bluefront on Nov 14, 2010 13:23:42 GMT -5
^^^^Well yeah.....a spacer at the bottom of the cylinder would lower the compression, depending on how thick it was, but. You have the cam chain to worry about, since it doesn't have much free-play. And a couple of gaskets won't lower the compression very much. And you have to be certain there are no leaks at that gasket(s).....engine oil is under pressure right there, going to the upper end.
|
|
|
Post by Bluefront on Nov 14, 2010 13:57:41 GMT -5
Rocket's method of measuring combustion chamber capacity, is the same as I have seen used before. How/why his tests came up with such a low compression ratio.....unknown. If you Google "GY6 50cc compression ratio" you'll get a ton of hits....most are manufacture specs around 10.5:1 (these are for air-cooled engines with standard cylinders). However....since there are a bunch of different Chinese manufacturers of the OEM pieces, as well as the BBKs, it's quite likely no two tests with pieces acquired from different sources, would yield similar numbers. Here's what a modified "performance" head from Scrappy looks like....the arrow points to the machined out area, designed to lower the compression (looks almost like what I did to my own head with a Dremel). You could argue this bevel helps the airflow through the head....and it does at the expense of lowered compression. Here is my stock 50cc piston, with the wrist pin stuck into a 72cc piston. The height of the two pistons is exactly the same. The stock piston has a very short "dome"....the 72cc piston has a very small "dish" in the center. This difference will lower the combustion chamber volume of a 72cc engine using the stock head....but very slightly. And not nearly enough to make up for the bigger 72cc cylinder volume. Meaning.....Using this particular BBK with the stock head, will give you a compression ratio much higher than stock. So.....what is the stock compression on a GY6 50cc? Probably varies somewhat depending on the brand/model/parts supplier used that particular day of production/and so on. From looking at the setup I have, I tend to believe what most of the spec sheets say.....around 10:1. And raising the compression much further than that......is a gamble in my book. Buy a head somewhere with that "bevel" already cut in it......many places sell one. Here's another type... Either that or drag out your Dremel and do it by hand. Your engine will last longer......IMHO.
|
|
|
Post by redvettenc on Jan 2, 2011 1:06:53 GMT -5
And thats why I am Doing the head on my yammi. My Tomos had a 70cc airsal kit with a stock head. It was fast but it didn't last. The high compression wore out the seals in the lower bearings and blew one out, and on and a35 engine, it blows.
|
|
|
Post by tortoise on Jan 2, 2011 12:41:26 GMT -5
My Tomos had a 70cc airsal kit with a stock head. It was fast but it didn't last. The high compression wore out the seals in the lower bearings and blew one out, and on and a35 engine, it blows. For context . . the Tomos A35 is a 2-stroke engine.
|
|
|
Post by Bluefront on Jan 2, 2011 13:35:11 GMT -5
Yeah and the same thing applies......go too high with the compression and you risk engine damage.
I think a 2-stroke will go/blow even quicker than a 4-stroke. I had an OSSA 230cc (trail 2-stroke) for a few years. These bikes were subject to piston seizures if you did high-speed street riding (stock). When I got my OSSA, the first thing I did was pull the head, and machine out a bunch of aluminum (had access to a milling machine back then).
I never seized, even though I rode it everywhere. Others I knew seized when they road hard on the highway. There is simply no sense in risking engine damage...if you're not racing.
|
|
|
Post by Enviromoto on Jan 2, 2011 14:33:25 GMT -5
So your gonna take Chinese specs over a highly skilled motor builders specs? Whatever floats your boat there Bluefront.
|
|
|
Post by Bluefront on Jan 2, 2011 15:10:01 GMT -5
^^^^^Some of these BBKs raise the compression so much, the starter has trouble cranking the engine. So I've read here anyway. That's a sure sign of excessive compression, if the engine was cranking normally before the mods. What other explanation is there for that symptom?
Then there's that little symptom of some of these BBKs self-destructing after a few miles.....
Not for me.....if I can do something to avoid it.
|
|
|
Post by lshigham on Jan 2, 2011 17:17:14 GMT -5
Or, it could be a sign of an underpowered starter?
Mine had no problems with a 83cc BBK and stock head.
|
|
|
Post by Enviromoto on Jan 2, 2011 17:18:10 GMT -5
Starter issues I believe relate to the batter being undercharged or going bad. The self-destruction that I have seen and heard about has been because of poor tuning, not compression.
The bottom end bearings do go bad with the larger displacements but its because of the torque they put out not because of the hp imo.
|
|
|
Post by Bluefront on Jan 2, 2011 18:34:07 GMT -5
Well my 72cc BBK cranks just fine. If it hadn't, I would have hooked up a jumper battery to eliminate any battery issues. All these kits/pistons are not created equal.....presumably. So some kits might give higher compression than others. The starters on some engines may be marginal, when dealing with higher compression.
The self-destruction thing.....hard to point the blame accurately. Blown out crank bearing or main bearings are a possibility, as is a broken piston/rings. Probably a number of pieces could/do fail. As to the exact reason.....take your pick. I'll place the blame on the higher compression, and the rest of the engine pieces being unable to stand the extra strain.
As I've already said.....buy a "performance head" to go with your BBK. It may save you a bunch of headaches.
|
|
|
Post by lshigham on Jan 2, 2011 19:01:33 GMT -5
Starter issues I believe relate to the batter being undercharged or going bad. The self-destruction that I have seen and heard about has been because of poor tuning, not compression. The bottom end bearings do go bad with the larger displacements but its because of the torque they put out not because of the hp imo. I've a good example of self destruction, a 52mm BBK with stock crank = snapped con rod. I'm still planning on doing another 139QMB build though.
|
|